Yamaha YP250 MOT pass rate and common failures

Yamaha YP250 motorcycles pass the MOT 85.97% of the time, measured across 335 tests in the DVSA record. A further 5.67% passed only after a defect was put right at the test station.

About average - within 0.9 points of the 86.87% figure for all motorcycles tested.
Pass rate 85.97% 288 of 335
Fixed at the station 5.67% passed after an on-the-spot repair
Average mileage at test 20,328 miles
Average age at test 17.51 years old
Engine 249cc MOT class 1 and 2
For sale now 0 Yamaha YP250 adverts

What to check before the MOT

Built from this model's own failure record, not general advice.

  • Start with tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm - it accounts for 35.7% of failed tests on this model.
  • Then check not working and excessively binding, the next two most common reasons.
  • Age matters here: 91.55% of 6-10 year old examples pass, against 83.85% at 16+ years - a gap of 7.7 points.
  • The most common advisory is has a serious fluid leak (9% of all tests) - not a failure, but money you will spend sooner or later.
  • Average recorded mileage at test is 20,328 miles, which is the number to compare any advert against.

Pass rate by age

A single pass rate hides the most useful thing in this data: how the same model behaves at three years old and at fifteen.

Age at test Pass rate   Tests
6-10 years 91.55% 71
11-15 years 85.44% 103
16+ years 83.85% 161

Why the Yamaha YP250 fails

Share of failed tests on this model where the item was recorded. One test can fail on several items, so the column does not add up to 100%.

# Item Of failures   Tests
1 Tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm 35.7% 10
2 Not working 21.4% 6
3 Excessively binding 17.9% 5
4 Inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps 17.9% 5
5 Less than 1.0 mm thick 17.9% 5
6 Does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamp(s) 14.3% 4
7 Has a serious fluid leak 14.3% 4
8 Insecure 14.3% 4
9 Indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort 10.7% 3
10 Excessively stiff or notchy 7.1% 2

Most common advisories

Not a failure and not a legal requirement to fix - but an advisory that repeats year after year is money the next owner spends.

# Item Of all tests   Tests
1 Has a serious fluid leak 9% 30
2 Tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm 6.3% 21
3 Excessively stiff or notchy 4.2% 14
4 Indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort 3.6% 12
5 Less than 1.0 mm thick 3.3% 11
6 Has a major leak of exhaust gases 2.4% 8
7 Has negligible damping effect 2.4% 8
8 In such a condition that it is seriously weakened 2.4% 8
9 Corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced 2.1% 7
10 Tread not clearly visible 2.1% 7

Yamaha YP250 for sale

No Yamaha YP250 in stock at the moment - 83 other Yamaha bikes are advertised.

Similar bikes compared

Models of comparable capacity, so the comparison means something.

Model Tests Pass rate   Avg mileage
Piaggio VESPA GTS · 240-300cc 4,305 92.15% 9,875
Honda CRF 220-250cc · 220-250cc 2,452 89.76% 7,549
Honda NSS 250-297cc · 250-297cc 1,397 90.34% 17,407
Honda CRF 300 LA-M · 286cc 1,297 88.43% 3,963
BMW G310 · 313cc 1,129 90.79% 7,243
Piaggio VESPA GTS 300 SUPER · 277cc 914 93.76% 12,292

Source: DVSA MOT testing data, 2025 · updated Aug 2026 · licence and method

Yamaha YP250 MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Yamaha YP250?+
85.97% of Yamaha YP250 MOT tests end in a pass, based on 335 tests in the DVSA dataset.
What is the most common MOT failure on a Yamaha YP250?+
Tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, which appears in 35.7% of failed tests on this model.
Does the Yamaha YP250 get harder to pass as it ages?+
At 16+ years old the pass rate is 83.85%, against 91.55% for examples 6-10 years old.
Where does this data come from?+
From the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, which records every MOT carried out in England, Scotland and Wales. It is published under the Open Government Licence and covers 2025.
Does a high pass rate mean the bike is reliable?+
Not by itself. The MOT checks safety items - brakes, tyres, lights, structure - and says nothing about engines, gearboxes or electrics. Read it as a maintenance signal, not a reliability score.
Top