Yamaha XC 125 E VITY MOT pass rate and common failures

Yamaha XC 125 E VITY motorcycles pass the MOT 75.06% of the time, measured across 429 tests in the DVSA record. A further 5.59% passed only after a defect was put right at the test station.

Worse than average: 11.8 points below the 86.87% figure for all motorcycles tested.
Pass rate 75.06% 322 of 429
Fixed at the station 5.59% passed after an on-the-spot repair
Average mileage at test 18,490 miles
Average age at test 14.03 years old
Engine 124cc MOT class 1 and 2
For sale now 0 Yamaha XC 125 E VITY adverts

What to check before the MOT

Built from this model's own failure record, not general advice.

  • Start with not working - it accounts for 26.5% of failed tests on this model.
  • Then check has insufficient reserve travel and tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, the next two most common reasons.
  • The most common advisory is tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (8.9% of all tests) - not a failure, but money you will spend sooner or later.
  • Average recorded mileage at test is 18,490 miles, which is the number to compare any advert against.

Pass rate by age

A single pass rate hides the most useful thing in this data: how the same model behaves at three years old and at fifteen.

Age at test Pass rate   Tests
11-15 years 74.59% 366
16+ years 77.78% 63

Why the Yamaha XC 125 E VITY fails

Share of failed tests on this model where the item was recorded. One test can fail on several items, so the column does not add up to 100%.

# Item Of failures   Tests
1 Not working 26.5% 22
2 Has insufficient reserve travel 24.1% 20
3 Tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm 24.1% 20
4 The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25% 18.1% 15
5 Excessively binding 12% 10
6 Less than 1.0 mm thick 8.4% 7
7 Lens slightly defective 7.2% 6
8 Missing 7.2% 6
9 Not working on dipped beam 7.2% 6
10 Insecure 6% 5

Most common advisories

Not a failure and not a legal requirement to fix - but an advisory that repeats year after year is money the next owner spends.

# Item Of all tests   Tests
1 Tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm 8.9% 38
2 Excessively stiff or notchy 4.4% 19
3 Indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort 4% 17
4 In such a condition that it is seriously weakened 3.5% 15
5 Less than 1.0 mm thick 3.3% 14
6 Inscription illegible 2.8% 12
7 Significantly and obviously worn 2.8% 12
8 Has excessive wear or free play 2.6% 11
9 Tread not clearly visible 2.1% 9
10 Corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced 1.9% 8

Yamaha XC 125 E VITY for sale

No Yamaha XC 125 E VITY in stock at the moment - 83 other Yamaha bikes are advertised.

Similar bikes compared

Models of comparable capacity, so the comparison means something.

Model Tests Pass rate   Avg mileage
Yamaha GPD125-A NMAX 125 · 125cc 8,762 80.8% 45,039
Piaggio VESPA 79-210cc · 79-210cc 8,363 85.42% 11,710
Honda WW · 125cc 7,252 80.32% 40,134
Honda WW 125 A-M · 125cc 5,011 84.06% 29,846
Honda GLR · 125cc 4,737 79.99% 14,642
Honda CBF 100-125cc · 100-125cc 3,204 77% 15,203

Source: DVSA MOT testing data, 2025 · updated Aug 2026 · licence and method

Yamaha XC 125 E VITY MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Yamaha XC 125 E VITY?+
75.06% of Yamaha XC 125 E VITY MOT tests end in a pass, based on 429 tests in the DVSA dataset.
What is the most common MOT failure on a Yamaha XC 125 E VITY?+
Not working, which appears in 26.5% of failed tests on this model.
Does the Yamaha XC 125 E VITY get harder to pass as it ages?+
At 16+ years old the pass rate is 77.78%, against 74.59% for examples 11-15 years old.
Where does this data come from?+
From the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, which records every MOT carried out in England, Scotland and Wales. It is published under the Open Government Licence and covers 2025.
Does a high pass rate mean the bike is reliable?+
Not by itself. The MOT checks safety items - brakes, tyres, lights, structure - and says nothing about engines, gearboxes or electrics. Read it as a maintenance signal, not a reliability score.
Top