Kawasaki KLZ MOT pass rate and common failures

Kawasaki KLZ motorcycles pass the MOT 86.97% of the time, measured across 737 tests in the DVSA record. A further 7.46% passed only after a defect was put right at the test station.

About average - within 0.1 points of the 86.87% figure for all motorcycles tested.
Pass rate 86.97% 641 of 737
Fixed at the station 7.46% passed after an on-the-spot repair
Average mileage at test 22,928 miles
Average age at test 9.69 years old
Engine 1,043cc MOT class 1 and 2
For sale now 0 Kawasaki KLZ adverts

What to check before the MOT

Built from this model's own failure record, not general advice.

  • Start with inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps - it accounts for 46.3% of failed tests on this model.
  • Then check does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamp(s) and not working, the next two most common reasons.
  • The most common advisory is tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.8% of all tests) - not a failure, but money you will spend sooner or later.
  • Average recorded mileage at test is 22,928 miles, which is the number to compare any advert against.

Pass rate by age

A single pass rate hides the most useful thing in this data: how the same model behaves at three years old and at fifteen.

Age at test Pass rate   Tests
6-10 years 86.99% 661
11-15 years 87.67% 73

Why the Kawasaki KLZ fails

Share of failed tests on this model where the item was recorded. One test can fail on several items, so the column does not add up to 100%.

# Item Of failures   Tests
1 Inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps 46.3% 19
2 Does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamp(s) 34.1% 14
3 Not working 29.3% 12
4 Not working on dipped beam 29.3% 12
5 Too high 26.8% 11
6 Tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm 24.4% 10
7 Has a serious fluid leak 14.6% 6
8 Missing 12.2% 5
9 Does not illuminate by the operation of both brake controls 7.3% 3
10 Excessively stiff or notchy 7.3% 3

Most common advisories

Not a failure and not a legal requirement to fix - but an advisory that repeats year after year is money the next owner spends.

# Item Of all tests   Tests
1 Tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm 5.8% 43
2 Less than 1.0 mm thick 3.1% 23
3 Excessively loose 2.2% 16
4 Excessively stiff or notchy 2% 15
5 Indicates excessive fluctuation of brake effort 2% 15
6 Noise is clearly in excess of that emitted by a similar motorcycle fitted with a standard silencer in average condition 1.4% 10
7 Worn to excess 1.4% 10
8 Tread not clearly visible 1.2% 9
9 Seriously damaged 0.9% 7
10 Excessively tight 0.8% 6

Kawasaki KLZ for sale

No Kawasaki KLZ in stock at the moment - 1,109 other Kawasaki bikes are advertised.

Similar bikes compared

Models of comparable capacity, so the comparison means something.

Model Tests Pass rate   Avg mileage
Triumph TIGER · 969cc 16,144 91.27% 22,934
Triumph BONNEVILLE 642-904cc · 642-904cc 12,456 90.8% 12,824
BMW R SERIES · 1,152cc 9,796 91.92% 40,594
BMW R1200 · 1,170cc 9,521 94.43% 28,830
BMW S 1000 · 999cc 8,445 91.96% 15,282
BMW R1250 · 1,254cc 6,764 96.17% 17,373

Source: DVSA MOT testing data, 2025 · updated Aug 2026 · licence and method

Kawasaki KLZ MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Kawasaki KLZ?+
86.97% of Kawasaki KLZ MOT tests end in a pass, based on 737 tests in the DVSA dataset.
What is the most common MOT failure on a Kawasaki KLZ?+
Inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps, which appears in 46.3% of failed tests on this model.
Does the Kawasaki KLZ get harder to pass as it ages?+
At 11-15 years old the pass rate is 87.67%, against 86.99% for examples 6-10 years old.
Where does this data come from?+
From the DVSA anonymised MOT testing dataset, which records every MOT carried out in England, Scotland and Wales. It is published under the Open Government Licence and covers 2025.
Does a high pass rate mean the bike is reliable?+
Not by itself. The MOT checks safety items - brakes, tyres, lights, structure - and says nothing about engines, gearboxes or electrics. Read it as a maintenance signal, not a reliability score.
Top